Checklist for Comparing Referral Credit Conditions

Referral offers can use similar language while applying different eligibility, activation and usage conditions. Before relying on any promotional summary, readers can review the full terms and compare the points below. This approach keeps the focus on written conditions rather than assumptions about value or availability.

Start with eligibility

Readers can check who may participate and whether the terms distinguish between new and existing account holders. It is also useful to verify whether eligibility depends on a particular invitation process, referral channel or account setting.

The referral qualification and credit guide can be considered alongside the applicable terms. Readers should resolve any difference between a summary and the detailed conditions before proceeding.

Check how qualification works

Look for a clear explanation of what the referring person and the invited person must do. Readers can verify whether the required actions must occur in a particular order and whether a referral needs to be recorded before account activity begins.

Useful questions include:

• How is the referral connected to the invited account?
• Which actions count towards qualification?
• Are any games or account activities excluded?
• Can progress be viewed within the account?
• What happens if tracking does not appear correctly?

Compare credit conditions

Readers can check whether the credit is described as cash, promotional credit or another type of account value. The terms should also be reviewed for activation rules, usage restrictions and any conditions affecting access to resulting funds.

Pay attention to eligible games, contribution rules, maximum stake conditions and restrictions on combining promotions. Rather than assuming all play contributes equally, readers can verify the relevant game rules before using a credit.

Review limits and expiry wording

Check whether the offer places limits on participation, referrals or available credit. Readers can also look for expiry wording that applies to qualification, activation or use. Any time period should be read from the current terms rather than inferred from an advertisement or older summary.

Keep a record before acting

Readers may find it helpful to save the version of the terms they reviewed and note the relevant account details. If the wording is unclear, they can seek clarification through the service’s stated support channel before participating.

Final comparison checklist

Before making a decision, readers can verify:

• eligibility for both parties;
• the required referral process;
• qualifying and excluded activity;
• how the credit is classified;
• usage, stake and game restrictions;
• expiry and participation limits;
• the process for correcting missing tracking; and
• where the current full terms are displayed.

A careful comparison should prioritise clear conditions, accessible rules and suitability for the reader’s circumstances. If an important condition cannot be confirmed, the reader can pause rather than rely on an assumption.